Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Sisters in arms don’t fit overwhelming media preference for Bloomberg Moms

Similar examples of leadership, perseverance and refusal to knuckle under to "progressive" standards on approved viewpoints for women can be found in other groups, such as the aforementioned Second Amendment Sisters and The Well Armed Woman. So it’s understandable why “progressive” media favors subsidized weaklings, spooked by propaganda-fed fears, over self-confident women who refuse to be victims. After all, the latter have mastered tools that give most members of the press, especially the anti-gun male contingent, a case of the vapors.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Nothing makes more sense than a woman arming herself with a firearm. I hold a second degree black belt and boxed professionally before retiring around 2001.( And oh yeah, i'm a woman). Trained boxers male and female and had one female make it to the Golden Gloves finals in Madison Square Garden in 2008. Unless a woman is mighty big and strong (well built 200 + lbs.)she isn't going to physically beat a 200+ lb. well built male who knows how to fight. That leaves the only self defense option of the firearm...These clowns that say they want to empower women and then disarm them at the same time should immediately be seen for what they are: liars with an agenda..